The page you are reading is part of a draft (v2.0) of the "No bullshit guide to math and physics."
The text has since gone through many edits and is now available in print and electronic format. The current edition of the book is v4.0, which is a substantial improvement in terms of content and language (I hired a professional editor) from the draft version.
I'm leaving the old wiki content up for the time being, but I highly engourage you to check out the finished book. You can check out an extended preview here (PDF, 106 pages, 5MB).
The set of rational numbers Q is the set of numbers that can be written as a fraction of two integers: Q≡{mn | m∈Z,n∈N+ }, where Z denotes the set of integers Z=…,−1,0,1,2,3,… and N+ denotes the set of positive natural numbers 1,2,3,4,…. The interpretation is that some whole is cut into a total of n pieces and that we are given m of these pieces.
We read 14 either as one over four or one quarter, which is also equal to 0.25, but as you can see the notation 14 is more compact and nicer. Why nicer? Well let's take a look at some simple fractions: 11=1.012=0.513=0.33333…=0.¯314=0.2515=0.216=0.166666…=0.1¯617=0.14285714285714285…=0.¯142857 Note that a line on top of some numbers means that these numbers are repeated. The fractional notation on the left is preferable, because it shows the underlying structure of the number and it avoids the need to write infinitely long decimals.
Writing down rational numbers as fractions allows us to do precise mathematical calculations easily on pen and paper without the need for a calculator.
Calculate the sum of 17 and 13.
If we use the decimal notation we would have to write our answer as ans=0.¯142857 + 0.¯3=0.142857142857… + 0.333333333333…=0.476190476190476…=0.4¯761904. Wow that was complicated! And complicated for nothing too. Let us see how much simpler this calculation is if we use fractions: 17+13=3×13×7+1×73×7=321+721=3+721=1021.
The fraction a over b can be written in three different ways: a/b≡a÷b≡ab. The two constituents of the fraction have special names:
tells you how many parts there are in the whole.
many of these parts are given.
Consider two fractions ab and cd that we want to add together. If the denominators the same, then we can simply add the numerators: 15+25=35. If the denominators are different however, before we can add the fractions we have rewrite the fractions so that they have a common denominator. An easy way to do this is to cross-multiply: ab+cd=adbd+bcbd=ad+bcbd. The common denominator bd is obtained by multiplying the first fraction by dd=1 and the second fraction by cc=1. Because we multiply both the top and the bottom of the fraction by the same number, this operation does not change the fractions.
More generally, in order to add two fractions we need to find the least common multiple (LCM) to use in the common denominator. This is a number obtained by myltiplying the numbers together but removing the common factors: LCM(b,d)=b×dGCD(b,d), where GCD is the greatest common divisor: the largest number that divides both b and d.
For example if we wanted to add 16 and 115, we could put both fractions on the common denominator 6×15 (the product of the two denominators), but we could also see that 6=3×2 and 15=3×5, which means that 3 is a common divisor of both 6 and 15. The least common multiple is then 6×153=30, and so we write: 16+115=5×15×6+1×215×2=530+230=730. Note that all this LCM and GCD business is not required: it is simply the most efficient way of adding the fractions so that you don't get excessively large numbers. If you simply use the product denominator b×d you will get the same answer after simplification: 16+115=15×115×6+1×615×6=1590+690=2190=730.
Fraction multiplication involves multiplying together of the numerators and the denominators: ab×cd=a×cb×d=acbd.
To divide two fractions, we compute the product of the first fraction times the second fraction flipped. To illustrate this, consider the following calculation: a/bc/d=ab÷cd=ab×dc=a×db×c=adbc.
The multiplicative inverse of something times that something should give 1 as the answer. We obtain the multiplicative inverse of a fraction by interchaning the roles of the numerator and the denominators: (cd)−1=dc. Thus any fraction times its multiplicative inverse gives 1: cd×(cd)−1=cd×dc=cdcd=1. The “flip and multiply” rule for division comes from the fact that division by a numbers x is the same as multiplication by 1x.
To indicate a fraction like 53 which are greater than one we sometimes use the notation 123 which is read as “one and two thirds”. Similarly 227=317.
There is nothing wrong with writing fractions like 53 and 227 but some teachers say that this way of writing fractions is improper and demand that they be written in the whole-and-fraction way like 123 and 317. Whatever. Either way it is no big deal to me.
When written as decimal numbers, certain fractions have infinitely long decimal expansions. We use the “overline” notation to indicate the number(s) which repeat infinitely many times in the expansion: 13=0.ˉ3=0.333…,17=0.¯142857=0.14285714285714….
[ The Rappin' Mathematician: Fractions ]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZQDvb5Yjvw